律師依法提對新證據(jù)需準(zhǔn)備辯護(hù)時(shí)間被趕出庭，最高院院長：絕不能把律師趕出法庭

法治快評

<h3><font color="#333333">文|南都社論</font></h3><h3><font color="#333333">圖|百度圖片</font></h3> <h3>【導(dǎo)讀】今日一篇由原陜西一基層法院工作人員發(fā)的公號文章，將五年前南昌大學(xué)校長周文斌案審理中的經(jīng)南昌電視臺編輯加工后的錄像片段再次發(fā)布，引發(fā)關(guān)注。</h3><h3>據(jù)官方消息公號持有人原系一名普通法警，后因善于網(wǎng)絡(luò)宣傳被“重用”</h3><h3>但他可能完全不知五年前周文斌案的背景。周文斌系中國著名的水文地質(zhì)專家，俄羅斯工程院院士，南昌大學(xué)校長、教授、博士生導(dǎo)師，因抵制蘇榮被構(gòu)陷。一審被定受賄罪判無期徒刑，挪用公款5800萬判十二年。經(jīng)辯護(hù)律師朱明勇和易延友頑強(qiáng)抗?fàn)幎弻o期改為十二年，原判挪用公款罪十二年改判無罪。視頻顯示庭審期間，公訴人違反法律規(guī)定出示未提交給法庭并經(jīng)過編輯加工后的視頻資料作為證據(jù)，辯護(hù)人根據(jù)法律明文規(guī)定依法申請休庭延期審理，被“請出法庭冷靜十分鐘”后法院決定休庭三天。</h3><h3>隨后，最高人民法院院長周強(qiáng)在全國高級法院院長會議上強(qiáng)調(diào)：對有些法院動不動就將律師趕出法庭不能理解，并表示決不能將律師趕出法庭......</h3> <h3>著名水文地質(zhì)科學(xué)家，原南昌大學(xué)校長、博士生導(dǎo)師，俄羅斯工程院院士周文斌教授。</h3> <h3>該案審判長審理此案未結(jié)束即被撤換</h3> <h3>辯護(hù)律師提出庭前所有人都沒見到的證據(jù)難道不是新證據(jù)嗎</h3> <h3>律師被帶出法庭冷靜十分鐘后又被法官請回來。最后法院采納了律師的建議，此案并因此延期三天。</h3> <h3></h3><h3></h3><h3></h3><h3></h3><h3></h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; line-height: normal; color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);"><font face="PingFangSC-Semibold"><span style="font-size: 29.33333396911621px;"><b>最高人民法院院長周強(qiáng)</b></span></font></h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 22px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang SC"; color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);"><span style="font-family: PingFangSC-Semibold; font-weight: bold; font-size: 22pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">絕不能</span><span style="font-family: TimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT; font-weight: bold; font-size: 22pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangSC-Semibold; font-weight: bold; font-size: 22pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">把律師趕出法庭</span></h3><h3> </h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(102, 102, 102); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 14pt; text-decoration: underline; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">作者：南都社論</span><a href="http://news.ifeng.com/a/20150125/43014164_0.shtml?from=singlemessage&isappinstalled=0" target="_blank" class="link" style="font-family: PingFangSC-light;"><span class="iconfont icon-iconfontlink"> </span>【南都社論】絕不能把律師趕出法庭</a></h3><h3> </h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(150, 103, 34); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(150, 103, 34);"><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">法官回到居中裁量的法定位置，公訴方與辯護(hù)律師各司其職，在尊重法庭規(guī)則的前提下進(jìn)行訴辯對抗，這是最基本的訴訟格局。</span></h3><h3> </h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);"><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">日前，全國高級法院院長會議在北京舉行，最高人民法院院長周強(qiáng)表示，要切實(shí)解決</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">庭審虛化</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">、走過場和擺形式的問題，只有解決這些問題才能實(shí)現(xiàn)公正司法。據(jù)人民網(wǎng)報(bào)道，周強(qiáng)對</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">法官老把律師趕出法庭</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">現(xiàn)象百思不得其解，并認(rèn)為這需要</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">提高庭審能力和轉(zhuǎn)變審判觀念</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangSC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">，最高法已經(jīng)準(zhǔn)備修改完善庭審規(guī)則。</span></h3><h3> </h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);"><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">讓律師充分發(fā)表意見，有什么壞處？多聽聽意見不是好事嗎？只要遵守法庭規(guī)則，充分聽取雙方處境，對公正司法非常有好處</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">……</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">這是公正司法的關(guān)鍵，也是建立以審判訴訟為中心的制度的關(guān)鍵</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangSC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">，最高法首席大法官周強(qiáng)的幾段發(fā)言得到法律實(shí)務(wù)界人士的廣泛關(guān)注，不僅在于媒體報(bào)道原話照錄、口語化的語言風(fēng)格，有別于以往官方文稿中的刻板印象，更重要的是，此次全國高院院長會議對</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">庭審虛化</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">問題的關(guān)注，以及對保障律師辯護(hù)權(quán)的積極態(tài)度。</span></h3><h3> </h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);"><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">此前，最高法常務(wù)副院長沈德詠在那篇著名的反思冤假錯案文章中，也用了非常大的篇幅來談辯護(hù)律師的重要作用。沈德詠從辯護(hù)律師的角色設(shè)置入手，強(qiáng)調(diào)訴訟對抗、法官居中的必要性，認(rèn)為</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">辯護(hù)律師是法庭最可信賴和應(yīng)當(dāng)依靠的力量</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">。既然</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">律師不與公訴人對抗，反而同主持庭審的法官進(jìn)行對抗，甚至演變成了對手</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangSC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">，那么就必須要搞清楚，到底是對法律較真的律師錯了，還是法官</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">(</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">或許被迫</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">)</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">模糊了居中裁量的自身角色？</span></h3><h3> </h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);"><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">圍繞刑事訴訟所延展、存在和運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)的各方主體，律師與偵控審機(jī)關(guān)的最大不同，就在于律師角色從</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">國家法律工作者</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">變成了</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">為當(dāng)事人提供法律服務(wù)的執(zhí)業(yè)人員</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangSC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">，沒有了公權(quán)力的機(jī)關(guān)屬性。而相應(yīng)的，偵控審機(jī)關(guān)經(jīng)由刑訴法加持的</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">分工負(fù)責(zé)，互相配合，互相制約</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">關(guān)系，由于長時(shí)間以來對</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">相互配合</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">的過分強(qiáng)調(diào)，使得律師在法庭上的角色被長期弱化。律師</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">(</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">尤其是本地律師</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">)</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">在庭審過程中是否</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">配合</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">既定節(jié)奏、是否聽話，成為一些地方衡量和管理律師的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。而律師角色的弱化，被告人權(quán)益在刑事訴訟的過程中，就難以得到有效、全面的保障，不僅是庭審期間，也就在日前，最高檢檢察長曹建明不約而同地表態(tài)，稱</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">保障律師依法行使執(zhí)業(yè)權(quán)利，從工作機(jī)制上保證律師的意見被聽取、合理意見被采信</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">。</span></h3><h3> </h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);"><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">周強(qiáng)坦言，</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">問題在哪里我們也知道，都協(xié)調(diào)好了要怎么判</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">。所謂</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">都協(xié)調(diào)好了</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangSC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">，指的便是刑事訴訟中偵控審機(jī)關(guān)基于</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">互相配合</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">的關(guān)系屬性而導(dǎo)致的庭審角色越位，法官不再中立，成了第二公訴人，</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">庭審虛化、走過場和擺形式</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">并不是個(gè)別現(xiàn)象。正如新近爆出的</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">律師集體退庭</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">事件，庭審過程中律師就發(fā)現(xiàn)，書記員將公訴人的舉證內(nèi)容提前記錄在案，未經(jīng)質(zhì)證的公訴方內(nèi)容被提前記錄在案，后續(xù)的法庭辯論意義還有多少？此種讓庭審形同虛設(shè)的行為，當(dāng)庭發(fā)現(xiàn)卻不被糾正，正是首席大法官周強(qiáng)憂心忡忡之所在。</span></h3><h3> </h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);"><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">律師、尤其是對法律程序較真的律師，</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">打亂了原來的程序</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangSC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">，法庭沖突變得一觸即發(fā)，場面看似不可控，</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">法官老把律師趕出法庭</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">便成了一種解決上述亂象的方法，或許簡單粗暴，但卻信手拈來，即便到現(xiàn)在，法檢機(jī)關(guān)內(nèi)部也不乏對此的支持聲音。但庭審再走過場，把指出其問題所在的律師趕出法庭，絕非最好的解決辦法，周強(qiáng)所言</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">恰恰是要改革的對象</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangSC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">，顯然也不是解決掉所謂</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">添亂</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">的律師，而是反求諸己、讓庭審變得</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">實(shí)</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">起來。</span></h3><h3> </h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 16px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);"><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">法官回到居中裁量的法定位置，公訴方與辯護(hù)律師各司其職，在尊重法庭規(guī)則的前提下進(jìn)行訴辯對抗，這是最基本的訴訟格局，也是最應(yīng)該重申和強(qiáng)調(diào)的程序正義。</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">“</span><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">把律師趕出法庭</span><span style="font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">”</span><span style="font-family: PingFangSC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">，這個(gè)讓首席大法官百思不得其解的問題，其實(shí)并非沒有答案。</span></h3><h3> </h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43);"><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 12pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">南都社論</span></h3><p style="font-stretch: normal; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal; font-family: "PingFang TC"; color: rgb(153, 153, 153); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(153, 153, 153);"><span style="font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 12pt; -webkit-font-kerning: none;">南方都市報(bào)就重大社會、時(shí)政問題發(fā)表的社論</span></h3><h3><span style="color: rgb(43, 43, 43); font-family: PingFangTC-Regular; font-size: 16pt; -webkit-text-stroke-color: rgb(43, 43, 43); -webkit-text-stroke-width: initial;">時(shí)事話題</span></h3><h3></h3><h3></h3><h3></h3> <h3>周文斌庭審中脫掉黃馬甲受最高院支持</h3>

亚拍区欧拍区自拍区|日本强奸久久天堂色网站|午夜羞羞福利视频|你懂得福利影院|国产超级Avav无码成人|超碰免费人人成人色综合|欧美岛国一二三区|黄片欧美亚洲第一|人妻精品免费成人片在线|免费黄色片不日本

律師依法提對新證據(jù)需準(zhǔn)備辯護(hù)時(shí)間被趕出庭，最高院院長：絕不能把律師趕出法庭

法治快評